Open main menu


No Man's Sky
No Man's Sky.jpg
One Man's Lie.
Genre: Survival
Action-adventure
Platforms: Microsoft Windows
PlayStation 4
Xbox One
Release Date: August 2016 (PS4, PC)
July 24, 2018 (Xbox One)
Developer: Hello Games
Publisher: Hello Games


No Man's Sky is a survival game developed and published by Hello Games for PlayStation 4 and Microsoft Windows, and was released in August 2016.

The game is said to be able to produce over 18.6 quintillion different planets to explore.

Why It Sucks (Launch)

  1. It cost $60 at launch, yet it feels like an early access game despite the several delays.
  2. False advertising: In many interviews Sean Murray, the lead developer, was asked about features would be included in the game and he said yes to almost everything. The trailers and displayed gameplay from development builds were equally misleading, containing features that never made it into the final game.
  3. Hello Games did not help their case by going completely silent on social media for months after the game's release, leading to many speculating that the game had been abandoned or even that it had always been a scam. While it turned out that they were working on the 1.1 "Foundation Update" that ultimately released in late November 2016, this long period of silence did almost as much damage to the game as the hype had.
  4. Quantity over Quality. The entire game is sold on how big its world is instead of what you can do in that world. While the game can produce 18.6 quintillion planets through procedural algorithms, those quickly exhaust the available assets and become repetitive and similar. Once you get past the lie of a giant universe to explore, you realize that this is just another survival crafting game.
    • This is because it takes surprisingly few variables to produce a huge number of outcomes: the most obvious example would be that with the threefold-repetition stalemate rule, there are still more possible games of chess than there are atoms in the universe.
    • The advertising essentially claimed that this entire massive universe had been pre-made, but it actually just denotes the number of possible states the procedural model can generate. Far from having a vast, fixed universe to explore, the game actually only bothers to remember the last five or so star systems you visited.
  5. Gameplay becomes boring and tedious quickly after you leave the first planet. Soon the game boils down to mining resources to go to another planet, occasionally getting enough resources to craft something that makes you slightly better at mining resources. While Hello Games has added many features over time, none do much to change this.
  6. It took over a year to make multiplayer possible (despite Murray claiming it was in the base game and players could meet each other, with some handwaving about how "the universe" was so vast they probably never would) and even then the multiplayer is lackluster.
  7. Mediocre space combat.
  8. Dreadful inventory management.
  9. Frequent crashes in early versions.
  10. Zero plot or true objectives. Update 1.3 added a mission system and according to the devs it had 30 hours of story content, however, this story mode is nothing but fetch quests with a narrative about how the entire game is just a simulation in the mind of an AI or some other nonsense.
  11. The interface requires you to hold a button for seconds to do any action in the game, and there is no option to make it so you can merely click or press a button to do actions in the game.
  12. Alien species you find in planets do nothing but stand in the same place and talk to the player.
  13. Reaching the galactic core does nothing but restart the game in a "new galaxy" (which is generated using the exact same procedural algorithm as the old one), causing you to lose technological progress made up to that point.
  14. Many solid models in the game such as Ore and Stone are missing. Only textures exist and they disappear when you get close to them.
  15. If you start the game in a hostile or dangerous planet, leaving it might prove too difficult.
  16. The game begins after you have crashed your ship. This is literally impossible in the game due to the condescendingly hand-holdy flight controls that automatically steer you away from scary things.
  17. Because of the procedural generation, the "Survival Mode" added in the 1.1 patch was an extremely frustrating exercise in being screwed over by random number generators, often producing planets so hostile it was effectively game over to land on them.
  18. The game looks really ugly, unfinished, and cheap for most of the time looking like a late PS2 game or an early Xbox Live Arcade/PlayStation Network game even though it's on Xbox One, PS4, and PC.

Redeeming Qualities

  1. It can be an oddly relaxing game to play at times, if one doesn't mind the price tag.
  2. The soundtrack is nice. An example of this is Debutance by 65daysofstatic (which can be heard in the game's trailer and the Beyond update trailer).
  3. The art design can at times be gorgeous to look at.
  4. Some of the newly added features reduce the tediousness of the game even if just slightly, for example, you can now summon your ship instead of having to backtrack constantly to find it again.
  5. While the damage may be already done and they should've done so before launch, Hello Games deserve a bit of credit for trying to add new things and improve the base game at no additional cost.

Reception

Initially, the game was highly anticipated and overhyped by gamers, to the point that when the game was delayed the developers received death threats. It was one of the most hyped indie games ever, and after some delays, it was released worldwide in August 2016. While the game was fairly well received by pretentious critics, gamers were strongly disappointed and angered by all of the missing features that were advertised. Many compared this situation to what happened with Aliens: Colonial Marines. As of this writing, the game has a "mostly negative" rating on Steam, with many of the user reviews being extremely negative.

Several reviews have pointed out that the game feels more like a beta proof-of-concept or an engine test rather than a finished product and that 10-15$ should've been a more reasonable price.

Angry Joe gave a 5/10 score (mentioning its the most painful 5/10 he's ever had to give), explaining that the first couple hours are enjoyable and that the game had a solid foundation and potential, but nothing more because then you realize there's nothing to do.

Due to Steam's refund policy that doesn't refund any games played for over 2 hours, many users were very angry and felt like they got cash-grabbed because they spent 3-4 hours at the enjoyable first planet before later finding out that the rest of the game is repetitive and boring. Later, Steam offered No Man's Sky refunds regardless of playtime. This is the first game that Steam has offered a special refund policy for a game.

The developers kept internet silence over the release and the missing features. Neither Hello Games nor Sean Murray tweeted anything for over a month after the game was released. After a month of internet silence, Hello Games had released a major update for the game called "The Foundation Update" which allows players to create bases and experience new modes for the game like Survival mode which is just a hard mode that provides limited resources and drains health quicker than usual. However, it wasn't enough to bring back the 90% of players that have abandoned the game.

On March of 2017 Hello Games released a second major update called the "Pathfinder Update" which adds more advanced graphics for the PlayStation 4 Pro console and also a permanent death mode where you lose your progress if you die.

Reviewer DarklordJadow1 made a review of the game in 2018, in which he continuously mentioned how long it took for features to be updated and how little they did to improve the game from the version at launch. DarklordJadow1 pointed out that even putting aside the overhype and false advertisement, No Man's Sky is still a bad game because of its shallow repetitive nature of it.

In July of 2018, a new update known as No Man's Sky Next was released, adding more graphical features, unlimited base building, command of frieghter armadas, and full multiplayer for the first time. However, this wasn't the case for GOG players. GOG players didn't get the multiplayer, and since Hello Games didn't tell them about this, many GOG players got so mad that an extended refund system had to be added for the GOG version since GOG users found out that they couldn't play with others.

Videos

Comments


avatar

HunterZolomon

3 months ago
Score 1
This is the one of the games that should not recieve new updates and improvements. It will be bad It’s always bad and it’ll stay like this. They should remove it from steam ps store xbox game market and other platforms and destroy it’s physical copies. Eye hurting
avatar

Necromancer223

2 months ago
Score 1

Nooo I don't think so. I think everything should improve if the devs really want to to be honest.

But it's unlikely the No Man's Sky devs will do anything considering their mindset and such.
avatar

Incrypt

2 months ago
Score 1

"But it's unlikely the No Man's Sky devs will do anything considering their mindset and such."

Dude?! Have you seen how much work they've done on it since 2016?
avatar

HunterZolomon

one month ago
Score 0
No I really don’t have to see it. Let this trash stay as trash
avatar

HunterZolomon

one month ago
Score 0
If a Developer wants to improve their game they should be do that in day one not abandon it

You are not allowed to post comments.